Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo

Comparative functionality of Croscarmellose and Carmacel as tablet excipients

Díaz Ramírez, Carmen C. et al · SEDICI UNLP · 2011

Supplementary material available
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

SEDICI UNLP SEDICI UNLP OAI-PMH
Entrar por SEDICI UNLP
Main access

Supplementary material available

El enlace apunta a material asociado, anexos, tablas, datos o página complementaria. No se marca como libro/texto completo.
Open material

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

The great variety of excipients to which we have access thanks the globalization gives rise to the necessity to evaluate their functionality, currently the pharmaceutical performance of croscarmellose and carmacel as tablet excipient. Carmacel formulations show faster powder flow and dissolution rate while Croscarmellose formulations show greater compactibility. Individually, carmacel formulations show greater powder flow and faster dissolution rate when the diluent is pharmatose or calcium phosphate but if the diluent is alfacel formulations with croscarmellose or carmacel show similar powder flow and dissolution rate. The compactibility of formulations containing pharmatose or calcium phosphate is similar for tablets containing carmacel or croscarmellose while croscarmellose formulations containing alfacel exhibit a greater compactibility. The functionality of croscarmellose and carmacel depends on the parameter and the formulation being considered. Current results are not contradictory with surrogate functionality tests where compactibility of croscarmellose tablets was greater while carmacel tablets showed shorter disintegrations times. the formulation being considered. Current results are not contradictory with surrogate functionality tests where compactibility of croscarmellose tablets was greater while carmacel tablets showed shorter disintegrations times. Colegio de Farmacéuticos de la Provincia de Buenos Aires

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

Díaz Ramírez, C. C. E. A. (2011). Comparative functionality of Croscarmellose and Carmacel as tablet excipients. http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/8157

MLA

Díaz Ramírez, Carmen C. et al. "Comparative functionality of Croscarmellose and Carmacel as tablet excipients." 2011. http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/8157.

Chicago

Díaz Ramírez, Carmen C. et al. 2011. "Comparative functionality of Croscarmellose and Carmacel as tablet excipients.". http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/8157.

Harvard

Díaz Ramírez, C. C. E. A. 2011, Comparative functionality of Croscarmellose and Carmacel as tablet excipients, SEDICI UNLP, available at: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/8157 [Accessed 5 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Comparative functionality of Croscarmellose and Carmacel as tablet excipients
Author / contributors
Díaz Ramírez, Carmen C. et al
Publisher
SEDICI UNLP
Publication year
2011
Language
English

Subjects

Explore related resources through these subjects.

Copied