Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo

Composite undergraduate clinical examinations: how should the components be combined to maximize reliability?

Wass, Val et al · SEDICI UNLP · 2009

Supplementary material available
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

SEDICI UNLP SEDICI UNLP OAI-PMH
Entrar por SEDICI UNLP
Main access

Supplementary material available

El enlace apunta a material asociado, anexos, tablas, datos o página complementaria. No se marca como libro/texto completo.
Open material

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Background: Clinical examinations increasingly consist of composite tests to assess all aspects of the curriculum recommended by the General Medical Council. Setting: A final undergraduate medical school examination for 214 students. Aim: To estimate the overall reliability of a composite examination, the correlations between the tests, and the effect of differences in test length, number of items and weighting of the results on the reliability. Method: The examination consisted of four written and two clinical tests: multiple-choice questions (MCQ) test, extended matching questions (EMQ), shortanswer questions (SAQ), essays, an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) and history-taking long cases. Multivariate generalizability theory was used to estimate the composite reliability of the examination and the effects of item weighting and test length. Results: The composite reliability of the examination was 0-77, if all tests contributed equally. Correlations between examination components varied, suggesting that different theoretically interpretable parameters of competence were being tested. Weighting tests according to items per test or total test time gave improved reliabilities of 0-93 and 0-81, respectively. Double weighting of the clinical component marginally affected the reliability (0-76). Conclusion: This composite final examination achieved an overall reliability sufficient for high-stakes decisions on student clinical competence. However, examination structure must be carefully planned and results combined with caution. Weighting according to number of items or test length significantly affected reliability. The components testing different aspects of knowledge and clinical skills must be carefully balanced to ensure both content validity and parity between items and test length. Selección de trabajos ya publicados sobre los que se trabajó en los talleres de las Jornadas de Educación Médica Sociedad de Educación Medica de La Plata

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

Wass, V. E. A. (2009). Composite undergraduate clinical examinations: how should the components be combined to maximize reliability?. http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/8525

MLA

Wass, Val et al. "Composite undergraduate clinical examinations: how should the components be combined to maximize reliability?." 2009. http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/8525.

Chicago

Wass, Val et al. 2009. "Composite undergraduate clinical examinations: how should the components be combined to maximize reliability?.". http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/8525.

Harvard

Wass, V. E. A. 2009, Composite undergraduate clinical examinations: how should the components be combined to maximize reliability?, SEDICI UNLP, available at: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/8525 [Accessed 8 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Composite undergraduate clinical examinations: how should the components be combined to maximize reliability?
Author / contributors
Wass, Val et al
Publisher
SEDICI UNLP
Publication year
2009
Language
English

Subjects

Explore related resources through these subjects.

Copied