Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo

Differences between oral and written calculation: evidence from cognitive neuropsychology from six brain-damaged patients

María P. Salguero-Alcañiz et al · Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia · 2014

Open access available
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Main access

Open access available

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Open resource

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Introduction: The study of patients with acquired brain injury shows the existence of several double dissociations in the calculation system. In this paper, we focus on the double dissociation observed between oral and written calculation. Method: Instrument: Battery of Evaluation and Numerical Processing and Calculation. Participants: Six patients with acquired brain injury who have different alterations in the processing of numbers and calculations. Data analysis: Difference of proportions. Results: MC and BET have impaired the written calculation but they preserve oral calculation (addition, subtraction and multiplication). The same is observed in MNL for addition and multiplication and in PP for subtraction. The reverse pattern is observed in IRS and ACH who have alterations in written calculation but preserve oral calculation (in multiplication and subtraction, respectively). Conclusions: The results demonstrate the functional independence of oral and written calculation. This could indicate that the calculation system is not unitary and responsible for any calculation task, but a multicomponential system involving different processes and of a different nature.

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, M. P. S. A. E. (2014). Differences between oral and written calculation: evidence from cognitive neuropsychology from six brain-damaged patients. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.2.150701

MLA

al, María P. Salguero-Alcañiz et. "Differences between oral and written calculation: evidence from cognitive neuropsychology from six brain-damaged patients." 2014. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.2.150701.

Chicago

al, María P. Salguero-Alcañiz et. 2014. "Differences between oral and written calculation: evidence from cognitive neuropsychology from six brain-damaged patients.". https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.2.150701.

Harvard

al, M. P. S. A. E. 2014, Differences between oral and written calculation: evidence from cognitive neuropsychology from six brain-damaged patients, Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia, available at: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.2.150701 [Accessed 8 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Differences between oral and written calculation: evidence from cognitive neuropsychology from six brain-damaged patients
Author / contributors
María P. Salguero-Alcañiz et al
Publisher
Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia
Publication year
2014
ISSN
0212-9728
ISSN
0212-9728
Language
English

Subjects

Explore related resources through these subjects.

Copied