Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo

Assessment and Recognition of MOOCs: The State of the Art

Rob Farrow et al · Humber Polytechnic Press · 2021

Open-access full text
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Main access

Open-access full text

Texto completo identificado como acceso abierto.
Open text

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Verification of learner identity is increasingly important for online education in examination and proctoring, and the Covid-19 pandemic has encouraged many institutions to move to online examinations at scale. This paper reviews state of the art approaches to ID verification, recognition and assessment in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC). Desktop research included research publications, grey literature and MOOC platforms to identify current practices. The main focus was on public data from course pages on MOOC platforms, particularly courses that had been grouped to offer a single academic program, Four approaches are identified: basic ID checks, checks made by the university, proctoring and various types of interview. Our review demonstrates the absence of any universal approach. However, the emergent picture shows increasing co-ordination across relevant stakeholders (including higher education institutions, employment services and the private sector). Several more coordinated strategies (such as Europe’s Common Microcredential Framework) are highlighted. There remain significant challenges for online proctoring, including overcoming learner preferences and meeting the increased resourcing needed for human-led processes of identity verification. There remain significant ethical challenges regarding the use of learner data (especially biometrics). MOOC platforms would likely benefit from adopting strategies that are well-established in higher education institutions such as plagiarism checking software and pedagogies like e-portfolios.

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, R. F. E. (2021). Assessment and Recognition of MOOCs: The State of the Art. https://doi.org/10.69520/jipe.v3i1.94

MLA

al, Rob Farrow et. "Assessment and Recognition of MOOCs: The State of the Art." 2021. https://doi.org/10.69520/jipe.v3i1.94.

Chicago

al, Rob Farrow et. 2021. "Assessment and Recognition of MOOCs: The State of the Art.". https://doi.org/10.69520/jipe.v3i1.94.

Harvard

al, R. F. E. 2021, Assessment and Recognition of MOOCs: The State of the Art, Humber Polytechnic Press, available at: https://doi.org/10.69520/jipe.v3i1.94 [Accessed 10 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Assessment and Recognition of MOOCs: The State of the Art
Author / contributors
Rob Farrow et al
Publisher
Humber Polytechnic Press
Publication year
2021
ISSN
2561-5904
ISSN
2561-5904
Language
English
Copied