Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo

Comparison of grapiprant and meloxicam for management of postoperative joint pain in dogs: A randomized, double‐blinded, prospective clinical trial

Anaelle Cassemiche et al · Oxford University Press · 2024

Open access available
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.
Serial publication

A de novo nonsense variant in the DMD gene associated with X‐linked dystrophin‐deficient muscular dystrophy in a cat

This serial publication contains 149 related contents.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Main access

Open access available

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Open resource

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Abstract Background Grapiprant is a novel anti‐inflammatory drug approved for the treatment of pain associated with osteoarthritis in dogs. Objective Compare the efficacy of grapiprant vs meloxicam for the management of postoperative joint pain in dogs. Animals Forty‐eight dogs presented with cranial cruciate ligament disease and treated by tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) between May 2020 and May 2022. Methods In this randomized, double blinded, prospective clinical trial, client‐owned dogs with naturally occurring unilateral cruciate ligament rupture were enrolled on the day of surgery. The day after surgery, all animals received a subcutaneous injection of 0.2 mg/kg of meloxicam and were randomly assigned to receive either oral grapiprant (2 mg/kg) or meloxicam (0.1 mg/kg), once a day for 14 days, in a blinded manner. The primary endpoint of the study was the pain severity (PSS) and interference (PIS) scores, assessed by the Canine Brief Pain Inventory (CBPI) at day 3, 7, 10 and 15 after the surgery. Results Three days after surgery, grapiprant treated dogs had lower PSS compared to meloxicam treated dogs with a mean ± SD of 2.76 ± 0.18 vs 3.25 ± 0.23, respectively (difference of −0.49 [95% CI −0.94 to −0.04], P = .032). Pain Interference Score was also lower in grapiprant group at day 3 (4.11 ± 0.18 vs 4.69 ± 0.16 in meloxicam group [difference of −0.58 {95% CI −1.03 to −0.13}, P = .013]) and at day 10 (2.23 ± 0.13 vs 2.72 ± 0.28 [difference of −0.49 {95% CI −0.92 to −0.01}, P = .049]). Conclusions and Clinical Importance Our study supports the use of grapiprant as an alternative analgesic to meloxicam for management of postoperative joint pain in dogs.

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, A. C. E. (2024). Comparison of grapiprant and meloxicam for management of postoperative joint pain in dogs: A randomized, double‐blinded, prospective clinical trial. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.17136

MLA

al, Anaelle Cassemiche et. "Comparison of grapiprant and meloxicam for management of postoperative joint pain in dogs: A randomized, double‐blinded, prospective clinical trial." 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.17136.

Chicago

al, Anaelle Cassemiche et. 2024. "Comparison of grapiprant and meloxicam for management of postoperative joint pain in dogs: A randomized, double‐blinded, prospective clinical trial.". https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.17136.

Harvard

al, A. C. E. 2024, Comparison of grapiprant and meloxicam for management of postoperative joint pain in dogs: A randomized, double‐blinded, prospective clinical trial, Oxford University Press, available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.17136 [Accessed 7 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Comparison of grapiprant and meloxicam for management of postoperative joint pain in dogs: A randomized, double‐blinded, prospective clinical trial
Author / contributors
Anaelle Cassemiche et al
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Publication year
2024
ISSN
0891-6640
ISSN
0891-6640
Language
English

Subjects

Explore related resources through these subjects.

Copied