Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo

Validation of models for predicting milk urea nitrogen concentrations, estimating dry matter intake by the NRC (2001)

Paula Marques Meyer et al · Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia · 2012

Open access available
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.
Serial publication

Acasalamento dirigido para aumentar a produção de animais geneticamente superiores e reduzir a variabilidade da progênie em bovinos Mating strategy for increasing the probability of producing outstanding animals and reducing progeny variability

This serial publication contains 208 related contents.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Main access

Open access available

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Open resource

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

The objective of this study was to validate three different models for predicting milk urea nitrogen using field conditions, attempting to evaluate the nutritional adequacy diets for dairy cows and prediction of nitrogen excreted to the environment. Observations (4,749) from 855 cows were used. Milk yield, body weight (BW), days in milk and parity were recorded on the milk sampling days. Milk was sampled monthly, for analysis of milk urea nitrogen (MUN), fat, protein, lactose and total solids concentration and somatic cells count. Individual dry matter intake was estimated using the NRC (2001). The three models studied were derived from a first one to predict urinary nitrogen (UN). Model 1 was MUN = UN/12.54, model 2 was MUN = UN/17.6 and model 3 was MUN = UN/(0.0259 × BW), adjusted by body weight effect. To evaluate models, they were tested for accuracy, precision and robustness. Despite being more accurate (mean bias = 0.94 mg/dL), model 2 was less precise (residual error = 4.50 mg/dL) than model 3 (mean bias = 1.41 and residual error = 4.11 mg/dL), while model 1 was the least accurate (mean bias = 6.94 mg/dL) and the least precise (residual error = 5.40 mg/dL). They were not robust, because they were influenced by almost all the variables studied. The three models for predicting milk urea nitrogen were different with respect to accuracy, precision and robustness.

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, P. M. M. E. (2012). Validation of models for predicting milk urea nitrogen concentrations, estimating dry matter intake by the NRC (2001). https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000500026

MLA

al, Paula Marques Meyer et. "Validation of models for predicting milk urea nitrogen concentrations, estimating dry matter intake by the NRC (2001)." 2012. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000500026.

Chicago

al, Paula Marques Meyer et. 2012. "Validation of models for predicting milk urea nitrogen concentrations, estimating dry matter intake by the NRC (2001).". https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000500026.

Harvard

al, P. M. M. E. 2012, Validation of models for predicting milk urea nitrogen concentrations, estimating dry matter intake by the NRC (2001), Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, available at: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000500026 [Accessed 9 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Validation of models for predicting milk urea nitrogen concentrations, estimating dry matter intake by the NRC (2001)
Author / contributors
Paula Marques Meyer et al
Publisher
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
Publication year
2012
ISSN
1516-3598
ISSN
1516-3598
Language
English

Subjects

Explore related resources through these subjects.

Copied