Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo

Estimation of the prevalence of fragile X syndrome in England from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink

Andrew Cooper et al · BMJ Publishing Group · 2025

Open access available
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Main access

Open access available

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Open resource

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Aims Accurate prevalence estimates are vital for the provision of healthcare services. We calculated the diagnosed UK prevalence of fragile X syndrome (FXS) and estimated the undiagnosed FXS population.Methods A retrospective study was conducted in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Patients with FXS were selected by relevant medical code. Point prevalence (1 January 2019) was calculated. Assuming no underlying change in birth incidence of FXS over time, the maximum observed age–sex-specific prevalence rates were applied to UK population data to determine a theoretical FXS population. Age and sex-specific mortality rates were inflated by an FXS:non-FXS hazard ratio applied annually to the theoretical FXS population.Results 1520 prevalent patients with FXS were selected; a prevalence of 1.15 per 10 000 population. The estimated prevalent FXS UK population was 7682. Males had a higher prevalence than females (1.49 vs 0.82 per 10 000). The highest prevalence for both males and females was observed in those aged 16–20 (4.10 and 1.46 per 10 000, respectively). Applying these prevalence rates to the UK population resulted in an estimated 18 300 with FXS, reducing to 16 663 after mortality adjustment; an extrapolated prevalence rate of 2.76 per 10 000.Conclusion The prevalence of diagnosed FXS in males and females was similar to that reported previously; however, this is likely to be a significant underestimate due to lack of confirmed diagnosis in older age groups. Our estimates of the prevalence rates are substantially higher and align more closely with previous population-screening estimates as well as imputed estimates based on allele frequencies.

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, A. C. E. (2025). Estimation of the prevalence of fragile X syndrome in England from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjccgg-2025-000010

MLA

al, Andrew Cooper et. "Estimation of the prevalence of fragile X syndrome in England from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink." 2025. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjccgg-2025-000010.

Chicago

al, Andrew Cooper et. 2025. "Estimation of the prevalence of fragile X syndrome in England from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.". https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjccgg-2025-000010.

Harvard

al, A. C. E. 2025, Estimation of the prevalence of fragile X syndrome in England from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, BMJ Publishing Group, available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjccgg-2025-000010 [Accessed 8 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Estimation of the prevalence of fragile X syndrome in England from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink
Author / contributors
Andrew Cooper et al
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
Publication year
2025
ISSN
3050-2551
ISSN
3050-2551
Language
English
Copied