Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo

Assessment of European Union countries’ positions in the context of circular economy

Žaneta Karazijienė et al · Vilnius Gediminas Technical University · 2026

Supplementary material available
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Main access

Supplementary material available

El enlace apunta a material asociado, anexos, tablas, datos o página complementaria. No se marca como libro/texto completo.
Open material

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Purpose – Assess the level of the circular economy in EU countries between 2020 and 2023, ranking them according to circular economy indicators and identifying changes in their positions. Research methodology – The study used the European Commission’s 2023 set of indicators to evaluate the performance of the circular economy across EU countries. Twenty-three indicators were selected based on data availability. Missing data were forecasted using the moving average method to ensure completeness for subsequent analysis. The CRITIC method was then applied to determine indicator weights and rank countries, followed by the TOPSIS multi-criteria decision-making approach to evaluate and compare national positions. Findings – The results show stable circular economy levels across the EU but with clear gaps between leading and lagging countries. Germany, the Netherlands, and Italy perform strongest, while Bulgaria and Romania progress slowly due to structural constraints. Lithuania, Austria, and other mid-tier countries advance gradually, with ranking shifts revealing uneven implementation of the EU Circular Economy Action Plan. Overall, the findings compare national progress and highlight key drivers and barriers to the transition. Research limitations – The study was constrained by incomplete and inconsistent EU statistical data, which required applying the Moving Average method to estimate missing values. In addition, the absence of a standardised composite indicator framework limited methodological comparability. Future research should prioritise improving data availability and creating unified guidelines for building composite indicators to strengthen reliability and cross-country benchmarking. Practical implications – The results provide policymakers and industry stakeholders with a clear ranking of EU countries’ progress in implementing circular economy principles, enabling targeted improvement strategies. The proposed methodology can be used to monitor nation- al performance, allocate resources effectively, and develop standardised evaluation frame- works for sustainability initiatives. Originality/Value – This study integrates the CRITIC and TOPSIS methods with the latest EU indicators – a combination rarely used in circular economy analysis. It offers a comprehensive multi-criteria assessment of EU countries, unlike earlier studies based on single or fragmented indicators.

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, Ž. K. E. (2026). Assessment of European Union countries’ positions in the context of circular economy. https://doi.org/10.3846/bmee.2026.25686

MLA

al, Žaneta Karazijienė et. "Assessment of European Union countries’ positions in the context of circular economy." 2026. https://doi.org/10.3846/bmee.2026.25686.

Chicago

al, Žaneta Karazijienė et. 2026. "Assessment of European Union countries’ positions in the context of circular economy.". https://doi.org/10.3846/bmee.2026.25686.

Harvard

al, Ž. K. E. 2026, Assessment of European Union countries’ positions in the context of circular economy, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, available at: https://doi.org/10.3846/bmee.2026.25686 [Accessed 8 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Assessment of European Union countries’ positions in the context of circular economy
Author / contributors
Žaneta Karazijienė et al
Publisher
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Publication year
2026
ISSN
2669-2481
ISSN
2669-2481
Language
English

Subjects

Explore related resources through these subjects.

Copied