Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo

A 50‐step walking test for analysis of recovery after decompressive surgery for thoracolumbar disc herniation in dogs

Suzanne Rosen et al · Oxford University Press · 2022

Open access available
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.
Serial publication

A de novo nonsense variant in the DMD gene associated with X‐linked dystrophin‐deficient muscular dystrophy in a cat

This serial publication contains 149 related contents.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Main access

Open access available

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Open resource

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Abstract Background Despite its importance, there is no agreed definition of recovery of ambulation in dogs with spinal cord injury. Objectives To validate a new walking test in dogs recovering from thoracolumbar spinal cord injury. Animals Two hundred twenty‐four dogs weighing <20 kg: 120 normally ambulatory dogs, plus 104 dogs undergoing decompressive surgery for acute thoracolumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Methods Prospective cohort studies. The distance each freely‐ambulatory dog walked during 50 step cycles was regressed on ulna length. For each postsurgical dog, we recorded when the calculated 50‐step distance was completed without falling, or their inability to complete this distance by 4 months or more after surgery. Bayesian analysis compared outcomes for presurgical neurologic categories; association of recovery with several preoperative variables was explored using logistic and time‐to‐event regression. Results For control dogs, 50‐step distance (m) = 1.384 × ulnar length (cm) + 2.773. In postsurgical dogs, the 50‐step test provided decisive evidence that deep pain‐negative dogs were less likely to recover ambulation than dogs with intact pain perception (12/29 recovered vs 71/75; Bayes factor [BF] = 5.9 × 106) and, if they did recover, it took much longer (median 91 days vs median 14 days; BF = 1.5 × 103). Exploratory analysis suggested that presurgical neurologic status (subhazard ratio [SHR] = 0.022; P < .001) and duration of presurgical anesthesia (SHR = 0.740; P = .04) were associated with rapidity of recovery. Conclusions and Clinical Importance This straightforward 50‐step walking test provides robust data on ambulatory recovery well‐suited to large scale pragmatic trials on treatment of thoracolumbar spinal cord injury in dogs.

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, S. R. E. (2022). A 50‐step walking test for analysis of recovery after decompressive surgery for thoracolumbar disc herniation in dogs. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16516

MLA

al, Suzanne Rosen et. "A 50‐step walking test for analysis of recovery after decompressive surgery for thoracolumbar disc herniation in dogs." 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16516.

Chicago

al, Suzanne Rosen et. 2022. "A 50‐step walking test for analysis of recovery after decompressive surgery for thoracolumbar disc herniation in dogs.". https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16516.

Harvard

al, S. R. E. 2022, A 50‐step walking test for analysis of recovery after decompressive surgery for thoracolumbar disc herniation in dogs, Oxford University Press, available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16516 [Accessed 6 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
A 50‐step walking test for analysis of recovery after decompressive surgery for thoracolumbar disc herniation in dogs
Author / contributors
Suzanne Rosen et al
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Publication year
2022
ISSN
0891-6640
ISSN
0891-6640
Language
English

Subjects

Explore related resources through these subjects.

Copied