Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo

Why the biomedical Sciences need Philosophy: theoretical and practical Reasons illustrated with examples from the BioThera Institute of Philosophy

Bianchini, Alahi Dana et al · Journal of Science Humanities and Arts · 2021

Open-access full text
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

CONICET Digital CONICET Digital OAI-PMH
Entrar por CONICET Digital
Main access

Open-access full text

Texto completo identificado como acceso abierto.
Open text

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

The biomedical sciences need philosophy on at least two levels. Firstly, we can find strong arguments that recognize the need for philosophy on a theoretical level, such as the development of scientific theories that in turn can have effects such as the development of new treatments or other medical interventions. However, philosophy, and particularly bioethics, is necessary for the biomedical sciences at the practical level, that is, in the daily practice of science and the achievement of its goals and results. In this work, we will reconstruct some of the arguments that point out the importance of philosophy for science on a theoretical level, and, furthermore, we will argue that these same conceptual tools of philosophy can be useful on a practical level of biomedical sciences too. To this end, we will present four cases from the conceptual research conducted by the BioThera Institute of Philosophy: the enhanced definition of medical innovation as a new non-validated practice, the ethical justification of the duty of States to promote clinical research, the fair play model for the distribution of fair benefits in clinical research, and the ethical model for allocation of extremely scarce resources in times of public health emergency. Fil: Bianchini, Alahi Dana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales; Argentina Fil: Mastroleo, Ignacio Damian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales; Argentina

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

Bianchini, A. D. E. A. (2021). Why the biomedical Sciences need Philosophy: theoretical and practical Reasons illustrated with examples from the BioThera Institute of Philosophy. http://hdl.handle.net/11336/166813

MLA

Bianchini, Alahi Dana et al. "Why the biomedical Sciences need Philosophy: theoretical and practical Reasons illustrated with examples from the BioThera Institute of Philosophy." 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/11336/166813.

Chicago

Bianchini, Alahi Dana et al. 2021. "Why the biomedical Sciences need Philosophy: theoretical and practical Reasons illustrated with examples from the BioThera Institute of Philosophy.". http://hdl.handle.net/11336/166813.

Harvard

Bianchini, A. D. E. A. 2021, Why the biomedical Sciences need Philosophy: theoretical and practical Reasons illustrated with examples from the BioThera Institute of Philosophy, Journal of Science Humanities and Arts, available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11336/166813 [Accessed 5 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Why the biomedical Sciences need Philosophy: theoretical and practical Reasons illustrated with examples from the BioThera Institute of Philosophy
Author / contributors
Bianchini, Alahi Dana et al
Publisher
Journal of Science Humanities and Arts
Publication year
2021
ISSN
2364-0626
ISSN
2364-0626
Language
English

Subjects

Explore related resources through these subjects.

Copied