Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo de revista

Identification of Pork Adulteration in Processed Meat Products Using the Developed Mitochondrial DNA-Based Primers

Jimyeong Ha et al · Springer Nature · 2017

Open access available
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.
Serial publication

3D Printing of Materials and Printing Parameters with Animal Resources: A Review

This serial publication contains 538 related contents.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Main access

Open access available

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Open resource

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Abstract The identification of pork in commercially processed meats is one of the most crucial issues in the food industry because of religious food ethics, medical purposes, and intentional adulteration to decrease production cost. This study therefore aimed to develop a method for the detection of pork adulteration in meat products using primers specific for pig mitochondrial DNA. Mitochondrial DNA sequences for pig, cattle, chicken, and sheep were obtained from GenBank and aligned. The 294-bp mitochondrial DNA D-loop region was selected as the pig target DNA sequence and appropriate primers were designed using the MUSCLE program. To evaluate primer sensitivity, pork-beef-chicken mixtures were prepared as follows: i) 0% pork-50% beef-50% chicken, ii) 1% pork-49.5% beef-49.5% chicken, iii) 2% pork-49% beef-49% chicken, iv) 5% pork-47.5% beef-47.5% chicken, v) 10% pork-45% beef-45% chicken, and vi) 100% pork-0% beef-0% chicken. In addition, a total of 35 commercially packaged products, including patties, nuggets, meatballs, and sausages containing processed chicken, beef, or a mixture of various meats, were purchased from commercial markets. The primers developed in our study were able to detect as little as 1% pork in the heat treated pork-beef-chicken mixtures. Of the 35 processed products, three samples were pork positive despite being labeled as beef or chicken only or as a beef-chicken mix. These results indicate that the developed primers could be used to detect pork adulteration in various processed meat products for application in safeguarding religious food ethics, detecting allergens, and preventing food adulteration.

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, J. H. E. (2017). Identification of Pork Adulteration in Processed Meat Products Using the Developed Mitochondrial DNA-Based Primers. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.3.464

MLA

al, Jimyeong Ha et. "Identification of Pork Adulteration in Processed Meat Products Using the Developed Mitochondrial DNA-Based Primers." 2017. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.3.464.

Chicago

al, Jimyeong Ha et. 2017. "Identification of Pork Adulteration in Processed Meat Products Using the Developed Mitochondrial DNA-Based Primers.". https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.3.464.

Harvard

al, J. H. E. 2017, Identification of Pork Adulteration in Processed Meat Products Using the Developed Mitochondrial DNA-Based Primers, Springer Nature, available at: https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.3.464 [Accessed 5 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Identification of Pork Adulteration in Processed Meat Products Using the Developed Mitochondrial DNA-Based Primers
Author / contributors
Jimyeong Ha et al
Publisher
Springer Nature
Publication year
2017
ISSN
2636-0772
ISSN
2636-0772
Language
English

Subjects

Explore related resources through these subjects.

Copied