Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo de revista

Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat

Ermie Jr. Mariano et al · Springer Nature · 2023

Open access available
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.
Serial publication

3D Printing of Materials and Printing Parameters with Animal Resources: A Review

This serial publication contains 538 related contents.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Main access

Open access available

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Open resource

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Abstract The cultured meat industry is continuously evolving due to the collective efforts of cultured meat companies and academics worldwide. Though still technologically limited, recent reports of regulatory approvals for cultured meat companies have initiated the standards-based approach towards cultured meat production. Incidents of deception in the meat industry call for fool-proof authentication methods to ensure consumer safety, product quality, and traceability. The cultured meat industry is not exempt from the threats of food fraud. Meat authentication techniques based on DNA, protein, and metabolite fingerprints of animal meat species needs to be evaluated for their applicability to cultured meat. Technique-based categorization of cultured meat products could ease the identification of appropriate authentication methods. The combination of methods with high sensitivity and specificity is key to increasing the accuracy and precision of meat authentication. The identification of markers (both physical and biochemical) to differentiate conventional meat from cultured meat needs to be established to ensure overall product traceability. The current review briefly discusses some areas in the cultured meat industry that are vulnerable to food fraud. Specifically, it targets the current meat and meat product authentication tests to emphasize the need for ensuring the traceability of cultured meat.

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, E. J. M. E. (2023). Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2023.e48

MLA

al, Ermie Jr. Mariano et. "Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat." 2023. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2023.e48.

Chicago

al, Ermie Jr. Mariano et. 2023. "Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat.". https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2023.e48.

Harvard

al, E. J. M. E. 2023, Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat, Springer Nature, available at: https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2023.e48 [Accessed 9 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat
Author / contributors
Ermie Jr. Mariano et al
Publisher
Springer Nature
Publication year
2023
ISSN
2636-0772
ISSN
2636-0772
Language
English

Subjects

Explore related resources through these subjects.

Copied